Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tanguy Genier vs Mathys Picard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Genier vs Picard analysis and find out who is favored!
Tanguy Genier vs Mathys Picard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Genier 1 - 0 Picard
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Genier has won 53.1% of points on their second serve, while Picard has won 45.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Genier, in recent form, has won 54.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Picard has won 54.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.39% and 30.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Genier has saved 58.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Picard has saved 62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Genier has won 61.4% of matches played (W/L 35/ 22), with Picard winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Genier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14). Picard has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Genier has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.4% of matches (W/L 35/ 22), where as Picard has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Genier winning 1 times and Picard being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Genier winning 2 and Picard winning 1. The last match between Genier and Picard was at the M15 Azay-le-Rideau, 14-04-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Tanguy Genier getting the victory 3-6 6-4 10-6.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Genier and Picard have played a deciding set 1 times, with Genier winning 1 times and Picard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Genier winning 0, and Picard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Genier has played against opponents with an average rank of 67.28 while Picard has played against players with an average rank of 169.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Genier has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Picard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Genier has converted 38.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Picard has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
L
50% (37-37)
Career Total W/L
20% (1-4)
59% (19-13)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tanguy Genier vs Mathys Picard For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Genier VS Picard
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Tanguy Genier | Mathys Picard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (40/57) | 66% (50/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (27/40) | 58% (29/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (7/17) | 54% (14/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (33/76) | 40% (23/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 10-6 |
Stats 
Tanguy Genier
Player
Mathys Picard
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
67
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tanguy Genier | Mathys Picard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (19/13) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (44/30) | 27% (3/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (393/356) | 43% (46/61) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (9/6) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 120 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:52 | 1:19:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.31 | 169.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1089/1767) | 61% (199/324) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (733/1089) | 59% (118/199) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (360/678) | 46% (57/125) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (81/210) | 50% (13/26) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (751/1819) | 40% (110/277) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (19/13) | 20% (1/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (19/31) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (21/17) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (21/4) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (3/0) |
Tanguy Genier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tanguy Genier
Player
Tymur Bieldiugin
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Bojarski
Player
Tanguy Genier
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Tanguy Genier
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tanguy Genier
Player
Max Wiskandt
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(1) 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tanguy Genier
Player
Filip Kosinski
45%
(
17 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Tanguy Genier
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Gschwendtner
Player
Tanguy Genier
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mathys Picard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tanguy Genier
Player
Mathys Picard
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
67
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Dussin
Player
Mathys Picard
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
2 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tadija Radovanovic
Player
Mathys Picard
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Samuel Puskar
Player
Mathys Picard
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Picard
Player
Christophe Pognon
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Genier Vs Picard Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Genier are available here and Picard photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
